Ethics on college student dating professor

Rated 4.55/5 based on 807 customer reviews

This chapter is one of several that address conflicts of interest of various types at The University of Iowa.

Others include: The integrity of the University's educational mission is promoted by professionalism that derives from mutual trust and respect in instructor-student relationships.

Such relationships may undermine the real or perceived integrity of the supervision and evaluation provided, and the trust inherent particularly in the instructor-student relationship.

However, the apparent consensual nature of the relationship is inherently suspect due to the fundamental asymmetry of power in the relationship and it thus may be difficult to establish consent as a defense to such a charge.

Even when both parties consented at the outset to a romantic involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for or preclude a charge or subsequent finding of sexual harassment based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct.

These examples illustrate the application of this policy, which as stated in II See also II-4 Sexual Harassment. When the class has concluded and Professor A has submitted the final grades, this policy continues to prohibit Professor A from engaging in a romantic or sexual relationship with Student B, if Professor A continues to instruct, evaluate, or supervise, directly or indirectly, Student B's academic work or participation in a University program.

Professor A and Student B, a graduate student in Professor A's department, are involved in a romantic relationship.

Leave a Reply